|
''Daniels v Thompson'' CA86/96 () NZCA 3; () 3 NZLR 22 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding exemplary damages in tort, in order to get around the normal restrictions that ACC legislation place on injury claims. ==Background== This case involved 4 victims claiming exemplary damages for sexual abuse they experienced against the offenders, all of which had been earlier prosecuted in court for this offending. The 4 cases were as follows: Daniels v Thompson - Upon the breakup of their relationship, Daniels unwisely sued his ex partner for the return of relationship property, which she lodged a counterclaim for kidnapping and rape, which resulted in him later being charged and convicted for these offences. J v Bell - J was sexually abused by a female W v W () 2 NZLR 1 - sued her psychologist for sexual abuse, and although court acquitted the psychologist after an 8-day trial, still faced a civil claim H v P - H was sexually abused by her father 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Daniels v Thompson」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|